Trader’s Narrative

This is a guest post by Wayne Whaley

The markets tend to be in a good mood the week before holidays, since 1950, the S&P 500 is 40-19, up 67.85 of the time during the four day week (including Friday) of Thanksgiving for an average gain of 0.78%

On average, all of those gains come on the two days surrounding Thanksgiving, which are 51-8, up 86.44% for an average gain of 0.80%.

The week after Thanksgiving can be a bit of downer and the markets have a bearish tilt as well, 28-31, up only 47.46% of the time for an average loss of 0.24%

The Turkey trimmings really take their toll on the Monday after Thanksgiving, as it takes the big hit, 24-35, up only 40.68% of the time for an average one day loss of 0.38%.

The last five Monday’s after Thanksgiving have been down, including last year’s (2008) loss of 8.93%.

S&P 500 % Chg for Thanksgiving the Last 20 years:

I couldn’t distinguish a discernible difference in the data in up or down years.

It has been my observation that since these type trading strategies became well documented over the last couple of decades, they tend to be anticipated a day or two. Be careful.

What better way to reliquify the world financial markets than sacrificing a currency?

If you’ll recall this is a well worn script. The last time we had a financial crisis, it was the Yen that was used as the vehicle of choice. Massive amounts of capital were borrowed in Yen and invested in other risky assets with the nudge-wink agreement of central banks that it was a one way trade.

Today it is the US dollar that is being sacrificed at the altar of the new bull market… in everything. Roubini has been among the most vocal to raise the alarm. But almost everyone else has decided to enjoy the trade while it lasts.

Of course, the sensible thing is to realize that you can’t drink yourself sober, just as you can’t dig yourself out of a hole. But since when have monetary policy wonks been fans of reality?

While it is difficult to prove definitively that the US dollar carry trade is the reason almost every single asset class has appreciated, its footprints are hard to miss. Here are David Rosenberg’s recent observations on the correlations across asset classes:

Historically, there is no correlation at all between the DXY index (the U.S. dollar index) and the S&P 500. In the past eight months, that correlation is 90%. Ditto for credit spreads — zero correlation from 1995 to 2008, but now it has surged to 90% since April.

There was historically a 70% inverse correlation between the U.S. dollar and emerging markets, such as the Brazilian Bovespa, and that correlation has also increased to 90% since the spring.

Even the VIX index, which historically has had no better than a 20% correlation with the U.S. dollar, has now sent that correlation surge to 90%. Amazing. The inverse correlations between the U.S. dollar and gold and the U.S. dollar and commodities were always strong, but these too have strengthened and now stand at over 90%.

The scary consequence of the US dollar carry trade is that it has pushed almost all risky assets to be correlated. And when the music stops and someone starts to unwind the trade, it will get ugly. When everything you hold is correlated to each other and everything else in the market, even a small tremor of selling will lead to an avalanche as the value of your portfolio starts to decline all at once.

If you expect gold to be a safe haven, you’ll be sorely disappointed. Historically, gold and gold stocks have never been a stronghold in a severe sell off. So maybe that’s why short term T-Bill rates have been pushed so low.

The big new development today was the huge drop in short term Treasury bond yields. The benchmark 90 day T-Bill rate dropped to 0.005%. These are levels which we last saw just a few months ago when we were in the thick of the credit crisis:

The 30 day T-Bill rate 0.03% which is slightly higher than the double bottom it made in December 2008 and the end of October 2009 at 0.01%. And the 6 months T-Bill rate closed at 0.14% - a low it has seen twice before but is still jaw dropping. They haven’t seen these levels since 1958.

Even more shocking, for some short term government bonds maturing in January 2010 the rate fell to negative. I’m not sure why everyone is suddenly clamoring for US government bonds. Are they afraid that a new shock is coming to the stock market? is there some tragic news that is about to shake global financial market? or are major institutional investors simply afraid that the low interest rate environment and the dollar carry trade will inevitably lead to even more trouble?

And if so, how in the world is investing in US dollar denominated assets and trusting the US government in line with that sort of thinking? Honestly, I’m puzzled.

In any case, this is an important variable which isn’t getting as much attention as it deserves. One aspect of it is that it has an effect on the mutual fund cash level metric which we discussed before.

This is the where the level of cash held by US mutual funds acts as an indicator of market tops and bottoms. Usually it is adjusted to account for interest rates which need to be equalized to iron out the rewards during high interest rates and the punishment for holding cash in low interest rate environments.

While this indicator has been known and followed since it was introduced by Fosback in the 1970’s, I introduced an important improvement on this indicator - an idea that to my knowledge hadn’t been before; to adjust for real rates, not just nominal ones. Adjusting for the effects of deflation/inflation, mutual fund cash levels are actually very low - something which is bearish.

With this recent drop in benchmark rates, this metric drops even further into bearish territory and signals an even brighter red flashing light. And as persevering readers will remember, I cautioned that stocks had little room to the upside when the S&P 500 was at 1098.51 - it peeked above that level and has fallen again. We are now 17% above the long term trend. That’s a slight drop from 19.31% that we saw just a few days ago, but caution is still the watchword.

Since some time has passed since my last call on Canadian REITs, I wanted to review it and update my position on the sector.

If you’re new to the blog you probably missed my comment back in early January: Canadian REIT Review. At that time I mentioned that it was irrational for well capitalized companies like the Canadian REITs to be sold off with the rest of risky assets. Remember, not only are these conservatively leveraged, they are diversified and throw off juicy monthly distributions. Of course, a devastating bear market cares little for value. Almost everything was sold indiscriminately as global investors ran like headless chicken to escape further losses.

In early January when I wrote recommending the attractive value evident in Canadian REITs, RioCan REIT, a commercial REIT I highlighted was trading around $14 a unit:

From there it deteriorated further, making a low of $11.50 in March 2009 - along with the vast majority of risky assets. If you were or smart enough to buy at exact bottom, you would be sitting on a 65% gain right now. But if you bought earlier when I wrote about it, it is still a respectable 36% gain. And that’s not even considering the monthly distributions which would pump the total return to 45%.

RioCan, at the March lows, was yielding an astonishing 12%. Of course, because of the pervasive doom and gloom, even the largest and strongest Canadian REIT was suspect. But RioCan has had no trouble in sustaining its distributions due to its top notch management and its heavily subscribed dividend reinvestment plan that allows it to conserve cash by issuing units instead of cash.

In fact, while the US commercial real estate market is seen as the next shoe to drop, Canadian REITs have recovered nicely and are poised for their role as (benevolent) vultures. Sonshine, the head of RioCan raised $150 million, announced a partnership with Cedar Shopping Centers (CDR). As well, the head of RioCan, Sonshine, has hinted of a major upcoming US purchase in the near future.

So all in all, the situation has reversed in all aspects. Now the news is all good and the stock is zooming higher. And as a result, RioCan is now yield just 7.21%. But while things are seemingly rosy, I’m getting ready to leg out of this position. There are a few reasons for that. First, obviously, is the sentiment which has shifted into full sunshine mode.

Second, the rocket ride higher has pushed RioCan to close 26.16% from its 200 day moving average. This is a simple technical barometer which I use to also analyse the general market but it also works for individual stocks. In the past when RioCan has come this far up into thin air territory, it has been unable to sustain its momentum. The last time prices where this far above its long term trend line was back in early 2007, just as RioCan was topping out at $26.

Finally, basic technical analysis reveals that price is now butting its head against the overhead resistance. What was a zone of support has now become a zone of resistance. And while RioCan could technically rise up to $22 a unit, the chances of that are slim. The same chart formation can be seen in almost all of the REITs in Canada. For example, take a look at Allied Properties (AP_un) or Boardwarlk (BEI_un) or Calloway (CWT_un).

Considering everything, putting new capital to work on the long side or continuing to hold here is not very prudent. The probability is that prices will either meander here as they enter resistance or immediately correct. In either case, the ride is over but it was fun and profitable while it lasted.

Guest post by Gary Grimes

Please understand that this article is about more than safeguarding your money; it’s about saving you headache and heartache. It’s about giving you peace of mind.

Before I explain, please allow me to ask a few questions:

• Have you given much thought about the money in your banking accounts lately? Do you know if it’s safe?
• Have you thought about what might happen if your bank fails?
• Did you know you could be left in the lurch for days, weeks, even months before you get your money back from the FDIC?
• What happens if the FDIC can’t cover your funds?
• How do you find a safe bank to protect your deposits right now?

I hope you’ve given these questions some serious thought.

I have to be honest: These questions were about the farthest things from my mind until about a year ago, when I downloaded the free “Safe Banks” report from my colleagues at Elliott Wave International. At first, the report scared me: I thought, “Oh My Gosh! I could lose all of my money if my bank fails. What would I do?”

But as I read on, I figured out that the report was not only about making my money safe; it was about giving me peace of mind.

If you’ve read any of the following news items, perhaps you understand the fear of learning your money might not be safe. Here’s a recent story from Bloomberg:

Sept. 24 (Bloomberg) — In May, the FDIC said it was projecting $70 billion of losses during the next five years due to bank failures. The agency said it expects most of those collapses to occur in 2009 and 2010.

The FDIC’s problem is that it didn’t collect enough revenue over the years to cover today’s losses. The blame lies partly with Congress. Until the law was changed in 2006, the FDIC was barred from charging premiums to banks that it classified as well-capitalized and well-managed. Consequently, the vast majority of banks weren’t paying anything for deposit insurance.

Of course, we now know it means nothing when the FDIC or any other regulator labels a bank “well-capitalized.” Most banks that failed during this crisis were considered well-capitalized just before their failure.

By the end of 2009, more than 130 banks will have failed. Most depositors will have little clue their bank was even at risk. Worse yet, the string-pullers in Washington are doing everything in their power to hide information about the safety of your bank from you.

So far, the FDIC has had enough money to cover insured depositors. But that money is quickly running out.

Just last week, the FDIC voted to mandate early payment of insurance premiums to help cover at-risk banks. But only time will tell if this move will provide the funds needed in the years ahead. Here’s what the Associated Press reported on Thursday, Nov. 12:

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. banks will prepay about $45 billion in premiums to replenish a federal deposit insurance fund now in the red, under a plan adopted Thursday by federal regulators.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. board voted to mandate the early payments of premiums for 2010 through 2012. Amid the struggling economy and rising loan defaults, 120 banks have failed so far this year, costing the insurance fund more than $28 billion.

Worse yet, three more banks failed the very next day, Friday, Nov. 13.

This is a very real problem and a direct threat to your money. It’s more important now than ever to personally ensure the safety of your bank. The free 10-page “Safe Banks” report can help. It includes the very latest bank safety ratings from the third quarter of 2009 to help you prepare for what’s still to come this year and next.

Inside the revealing free report, you’ll discover:

• The 100 Safest U.S. Banks (2 for each state)
• Where your money goes after you make a deposit
• How your fractional-reserve bank works
• What risks you might be taking by relying on the FDIC’s guarantee

Please protect your money. Download the free 10-page “Safe Banks” report now.

Learn more about the “Safe Banks” report, and download it for free here.

Gary Grimes focuses on mass psychology, U.S. stocks and the U.S. economy. Gary has a bachelor’s degree in journalism from Auburn University in Auburn, AL, where he was first turned on to the Austrian School of economics by way of the world-famous Mises Institute. His study of classical liberalism eventually led him to discover the Elliott Wave Principle and Robert Prechter’s theory of socionomics.