Trader’s Narrative

This week the sentiment data brings a very intriguing turn of events so let’s get started:

Sentiment Surveys
The star this week is the ever so humble and common AAII weekly survey of US retail investors. This sentiment indicator sends extreme signals every once in a blue moon. So I guess you better check the night sky tonight because we haven’t seen so few bulls in this survey in a long time.

This week’s AAII results show only 22% bulls and a whopping 56% bears. The last time we saw this few optimists and this many pessimists was the week of February 19th 2009. Just before the spring rally. To put that in (even more) perspective, out of all the data that we have so far, only 4% of the time have there been less bulls.

Here is a chart of the bull ratio (bulls divided by the total number of bulls & bears):

I’ve zoomed in to the past 7 years or so since showing the whole time series from 1987 would be overkill. From 2002 till now, there have been 8 instances where the AAII bull ratio was less than 30%. But as the last extreme reading in February suggests, it is best to not act in haste when presented with such a scrumptious contrarian gift. Historical data suggests that sitting on your hands for the next few weeks is the most prudent strategy (for longs).

I hope that I haven’t understated the gravity of this week’s AAII sentiment survey result because there is a high probability that it will once again prove to be prescient in pinpointing an upcoming inflection point. It is most definitely a tell that after a 55% rally we find the AAII bull ratio at such an extreme low when in early 2004 after a 37% rally from the 2003 lows the bull ratio was at the other extreme (see above chart).

The one puzzling thing is that the AAII asset allocation survey shows a slight uptick in equities (to 57%) while back in February when the bull ratio was so low last, it was closer to 40%. I guess the message the AAII folks are sending is that they like equities longer term but short term they’re very nervous. And that’s remarkable because of how little off we are from the year’s highs.

Investors Intelligence
While this week the AAII deservedly monopolized our attention, the measure of newsletter sentiment from ChartCraft is a snoozefest. The II this week is almost completely unchanged with 48.3% bears and 24.7% bears for a (yet again) bear to bull ratio of 2:1. I’m not sure how to reconcile these two disparate metrics but I do know that this is really nothing new as they often conflict with one another.

Hulbert Newsletter Sentiment
Thankfully, we have another measure of newsletter sentiment. Currently, the Hulbert Stock Newsletter Sentiment Index (HSNSI) stands at 3.2% - which implies that the average recommended exposure by short term timing newsletters is to be long 3.2% of their client’s portfolio.
Continue reading ‘Sentiment Overview: Week Of November 6th, 2009′

This is a guest post by Wayne Whaley, CTA:

Before presenting my latest seasonality study - which may be the most statistically significant - here is a short summary of the previous three studies that I have shared with you. Enjoy.

End of Year Positive Bias
Since 1950, the average annual return on the S&P 500 index has been 8.05%. Over half of that (4.25%) annual return has on average occurred in the three months, November to January.

(Abnormally) Positive Septembers
September is usually the weakest month of the year. But when September has a positive return, the last 3 months of the year have a strong positive bias (21-4) and an average gain of 4.84%. For full details, see: When September Flexes Its Muscle

Positive Septembers - Negative Octobers
If the a positive September is followed by a negative October, then the odds for the last two months of the year go to 10-1 with an average gain of 4.71%.

Seasonality When Jan-Oct Returns Are +10%
If the first ten months of the year provide a 10% or more return, then the final two months of the year are 21-3, with an average gain of 4.99% (see table to the left for details). Perhaps more interestingly, there was not a one percent loss in the the 24 observations.

If the end of the year rally doesn’t materialize with the tail wind of the above statistics at its back, it should be viewed as very bearish for the first quarter of 2010.

Gold has the wind at its back right now. Not only has it cleared the challenging $1000 resistance level, it has support from lax monetary policy as central banks around the world clearly hold the health of their economy in higher priority than the health of their budgets or their currencies.

The recent purchase by the central bank of India is being interpreted widely as a vote of strong support for the precious metal. Although I don’t argue against a secular bull market, it is amusing to me that a decision to buy gold at above $1000 is deemed to be a ’smart’ move when just a year ago they could have made the same purchase for 30% less. The fact that almost any news is interpreted as positive for gold has more to do with the prevalent sentiment than with facts.

In any case, before we get to the short term sentiment for gold, here is the recent commentary from David Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff on the monetary backdrop for a secular bull market in gold:

All India did was bring gold to a 6% share of its total FX reserves from 4%. Fifteen years ago, that representation was closer to 20%. China has increased its gold holdings by 76% over the past six years but they are a mere 1.9% of the aggregate 2.2 trillion of reserves and Russia’s gold holdings is just under 5%. This is not the 1990s when Bob Rubin was running a hard U.S. dollar policy, U.S. fiscal deficits were vanishing and gold production was on the rise. Today’s world is exactly the opposite. Policymakers beginning in the 1990s wanted disinflation and got it. Now they want inflation — it will take years, maybe a decade, but it will come. For the near-term, we are still optimistic on Treasury securities but be forewarned that this view has an expiry date that is earlier than the peak we are likely to see in gold.

It is very clear that central banks are behaving in a way that would suggest that gold is now again being considered a currency within the global monetary system. As we said before, it is all about relative scarcity and a well-defined supply curve — fiat currency at this juncture does not share that quality.

Turning to the breadth in the gold stock sector, you can see that we’ve seen a sudden and dramatic jump from a week ago. The chart below compares the percentage of gold stocks trading above their 10 day moving average with the Philadelphia Gold Bugs index (HUI):

If you’re interested in timing the gold market, then you would be concerned that 82% of gold stocks are trading above their short term moving average. But you would also be alarmed that just a few days ago, that number was below 10%. Historically, gold shares have a very tough time continuing to climb when faced with such short term headwinds.

Turning to sentiment in the gold sector, on Monday when we looked at the arguments that Paul Tudor Jones II presented for his case of a secular bull market in gold, we also digressed a little to check the Hulbert Gold Sentiment index. That sentiment measure was showing a majority in the bullish camp; which from a contrarian point of view means that gold probably will have difficulty in advancing in the short term.

In a similar vein, here is a chart, courtesy of Elliott Wave, which shows the price of gold with the Daily Sentiment Index (DSI). The most recent DSI is 91% which is just about where previous short term tops have been formed:

Similar to the breadth measure (shown earlier) the DSI increased to 91% in a sudden jump (an 8% point jump over a day). Accoding to Elliott Wave, which tracks the DSI, this was the single largest increase since March 19th 2009 (11% point jump from 75% to 86%) when gold made a two month high at $960. With Elliott Wave, not only do you get their analysis of various markets but they do a good job of monitoring DSI, which is a proprietary sentiment metric from trade-futures.com and by itself would costs about $2000/year.

Elliott Wave, by the way, is offering a rare limited time access into their premium content right now. FreeWeek happens only once or twice a year and provides you with full access to what subscribers normally pay more than $700 a year:

• Robert Prechter’s NEW October 2009 market letter, The Elliott Wave Theorist ($29 value)
• Steve Hochberg’s and Pete Kendall’s NEW November 2009 market letter, The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast ($29 value)
• Recently archived issues of the Theorist and the Financial Forecast ($29 value each)
• And a week of free access to Steve Hochberg’s Short Term Update, designed to keep your finger on the pulse of the following markets throughout the week: Dow, Nasdaq, S&P, Gold, Silver, Bonds ($39/month value)

This special offer will end in less than a week so sign up right now to take full advantage of FreeWeek.

Guest post by Robert Folsom, senior writer for Elliott Wave International

The following text is courtesy of Elliott Wave International. Until Nov. 11, EWI is allowing non-subscribers to download their latest market analysis and forecasts for free, including Robert Prechter’s latest Elliott Wave Theorist and Steve Hochberg’s and Pete Kendall’s latest Elliott Wave Financial Forecast.

Learn more about FreeWeek, and download your free reports here.

As you read and look at this page, please know that the chart is the star of the show. My description will add only a few details.

The chart published less than two weeks ago in Bob Prechter’s Elliott Wave Theorist. The rectangular box is plain to see: It envelopes the huge S&P 500 rally that began last March — a gain of 61.5% and 430 points, as of Oct. 18.

But there’s a two-part truth to the rally — and that is what the box really shows.

Part one shows the “wall of worry” — basically March through August. That’s when the media and experts were overwhelmingly negative about stocks. They were surprised by the rally. Remember?

Part two shows the more recent time of “euphoria” — basically September and October. The media and experts turned positive. The market was all about “green shoots” and “recovery.”

You see when most of the rally unfolded. Six months of serious worry produces a 373-point climb, whereas “two months of euphoria produces only 57 S&P points.”

Now, the two-part truth about this rally is an easy story to tell. It’s literally a few lines and notations on a price chart. Yet have you seen or read ANYTHING like this in the past two weeks? Has anyone else pointed out that over the past two months, the stock market “rally” has in fact slowed to a crawl?

As you looked at the chart, perhaps you noticed that the decline, which began in 2007, and in turn the recent rally, are both on a similarly large scale. The full version of this chart shows how important that “similarity of scale” really is (Elliott labels were excluded in consideration of Theorist subscribers).

Price action in the stock market this week has only strengthened the analysis in Bob Prechter’s October Theorist issue.

What’s more, you can read the very latest forecasts in the just-published November issue of the Elliott Wave Financial Forecast — both publications (plus the tri-weekly Short Term Update) are yours for free — only during FreeWeek (now through Nov. 11).

Learn more about FreeWeek, and download the November Theorist

Robert Folsom is a financial writer and editor for Elliott Wave International. He has covered politics, popular culture, economics and the financial markets for two decades, via print, radio and the Internet. Robert earned his degree in political science from Columbia University in 1985.

In today’s highly charged political environment, apparently everything and anything is game for the machinations of partisan political hacks. Even the US dollar has been pulled into this. So much so that it is generally believed and accepted that the US dollar is kaput, done for, worthless. And that the blame resides on the shoulders of Obama and his young administration.

But what if we step back from the raging and weeping talking heads on TV and instead of opinions, we just look at the facts?

Here is a chart of the US dollar for the past quarter century:

Reagan’s presidency presided over a boom and bust in the dollar - with the bust being the winning side. Trickle down didn’t really work but the deficit ballooned as tax cuts to the wealthy reduced government revenues. In 1989, the Republicans continued control of the White House with H. W. Bush’s presidency. While his administration managed to avoid a similar feat, the US dollar fell to new lows during the first half of his term.

The US dollar regained 50% of its value during Clinton’s presidency. You could argue that it was due to the balanced budgets and the elimination of the federal deficit. Or that it was due to the increase in the tax burden on the wealthy. There was even talk of reducing the federal debt. All that ended with the advent of the W. Bush administration.

Budget deficits and the US debt ballooned due to massive spending increases as well as tax cuts for the wealthy. The result was another major decline in the US dollar. Almost at the end of Bush’s second term the US dollar fell to multi-decade lows but recovered slightly as the last days of his administration drew to a close.

And that brings us to the present day with President Obama. He inherited an economy which almost overnight went into free fall. While I don’t agree personally with the measures taken to buttress the US economy, it bears noting that the US dollar is still above its recent W. Bush low. Also, as a contrarian, it is difficult to ignore the incredibly bearish view on the dollar right now.

So talk of a US dollar crash is either prophetic (if it becomes true) or Chicken Little-ish (if it doesn’t). And while 25 years or so is too small to make judgements on which, the Republicans or Democrats, are the better custodians of the US dollar, it is reminiscent of the counter-intuitive result of looking at the returns of the stock market under different political banners.

No, there is no free lunch. But for my US readers, there is a free trading magazine subscription in their future.. For a limited time, you can get a complimentary subscription to SFO magazine (Stocks, Futures, and Options).

It takes less than a minute to sign up and you need to provide some basic information. But as I mentioned, you need to be a resident of the US (because you need to provide a US address). Enjoy!